#archlinux-ports | Logs for 2026-04-29
Back
[00:02:48] -!- archmatrix has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:02:52] -!- heftig has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:02:53] -!- anthraxx|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:02:56] -!- C0rn3j|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:02:57] -!- bgyorgy|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:02:58] -!- solskogen|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:02:59] -!- dvzrv|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:03:02] -!- integral|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:03:07] -!- tpkessler|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:03:08] -!- artafinde|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:03:10] -!- carsme|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:03:10] -!- antiz|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:03:15] -!- tippfehlr|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:03:17] -!- jelle|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[01:54:36] -!- charon77|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[02:51:55] -!- idealseal_ has joined #archlinux-ports
[02:52:16] -!- idealseal has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
[03:11:26] hcmb is now known as Guest4359
[03:11:26] -!- hcmb_ has joined #archlinux-ports
[03:11:26] -!- Guest4359 has quit [Killed (platinum.libera.chat (Nickname regained by services))]
[03:11:26] hcmb_ is now known as hcmb
[04:08:26] -!- marmis7 has joined #archlinux-ports
[04:10:19] -!- marmis has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
[04:10:19] marmis7 is now known as marmis
[04:29:00] -!- charon77|M has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
[06:44:42] -!- charon77|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[08:19:08] <solskogen|M> Is there anyone here from the x86_64-v3 project?
[08:19:36] <solskogen|M> or do they have their own channel?
[08:24:36] <bertptrs> I'm not sure that project has materialised yet
[08:25:10] <solskogen|M> I mean, it exists. But it's as unofficial as our aarch64 project is :-)
[08:25:27] <bertptrs> does cachyos count?
[08:25:32] <solskogen|M> No
[08:25:34] <bertptrs> To my knowledge the aarch64 project is official
[08:25:48] <solskogen|M> It's not. Not my effort at least :-)
[08:26:14] <solskogen|M> and by my effort, I lie. I mean with the *very* good help of bschnei and @drzee
[08:27:40] <bertptrs> I'm not sure what counts as "official" then. And I'm pretty sure I'm "officially" part of Arch Linux
[08:29:13] <solskogen|M> When was that announced? :-)
[08:29:32] <bertptrs> We discussed the project a lot last summit
[08:30:18] <solskogen|M> That's something else.
[08:31:19] <solskogen|M> Discussing it and making aarch64 a official supported architecture for Arch Linux is two different things, I mean.
[08:31:47] <bertptrs> sure, but one is expected to lead to another
[08:32:16] <solskogen|M> Hopefully, yes!
[08:32:46] <solskogen|M> I'd rather say that there an official effort to get it done :-)
[08:35:23] <bertptrs> would you mind if I DM'd you?
[08:35:24] <solskogen|M> by all means! DM away :-)
[08:35:24] -!- wCPO has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
[08:35:24] -!- yuvadm has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
[08:35:24] -!- wCPO has joined #archlinux-ports
[08:35:24] -!- yuvadm1 has joined #archlinux-ports
[09:16:06] -!- filmroellchen has joined #archlinux-ports
[09:16:25] -!- charon77|M has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
[09:29:03] -!- charon77|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[09:55:56] yuvadm1 is now known as yuvadm
[15:12:46] <bschnei> bertptrs: to reduce confusion, I've taken to calling the status of the aarch64 Port "Pre-RFC" since that is a step that is required per the Ports RFC that we haven't gotten to yet
[15:26:39] -!- charon77|M has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
[15:27:00] -!- charon77|M has joined #archlinux-ports
[17:03:45] -!- f_ has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
[17:28:33] -!- f_ has joined #archlinux-ports
[17:57:29] -!- abelvesa has joined #archlinux-ports
[17:58:27] <abelvesa> bschnei: I have the arm64 port booting up nicely on thinkpad x13s
[17:58:50] <abelvesa> bschnei: working on getting it to work on xps13 9345 (X Elite) next
[17:59:18] <bschnei> awesome!
[18:04:37] <abelvesa> bschnei: meanwhile, you can add the x13s to the "devices confirmed working" section if you want
[18:06:12] <bschnei> so that would be the 8 series (vs the X series), correct?
[18:06:34] <abelvesa> yes
[18:07:03] <abelvesa> and I'm also working to get x1e80100-crd and glymur-crd to boot as well, but we are still upstreaming kernel support for it yet
[18:09:22] <abelvesa> any idea what happened to the linux-rc package ? Seems abandoned.
[19:25:28] -!- drathir_tor has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[19:25:52] -!- drathir_tor has joined #archlinux-ports
[19:35:57] <bschnei> i don't. graysky was in this channel a while back but I haven't seen them in a while.
[19:38:36] <abelvesa> bschnei: so if we want something similar to linux-aarch64-rc (from alarm) here on arm64 port, how would that be handled ?
[19:40:02] <bschnei> you could adopt that package in the AUR, clean it up and make it work for aarch64
[19:40:26] <Solskogen> I'd like to have that as well, so I would package it.
[19:41:00] <bschnei> you are welcome to steal the config from the linux package we build now
[19:45:09] <bschnei> yikes, that PKGBUILD could use some love for sure. if it were me, i'd start with the linux PKGBUILD and just modify the sources to point to rc
[19:50:42] <abelvesa> ok, I'll look into it. Thanks!
[20:26:03] <bschnei> awesome. happy to help if you get stuck. see also: https://aur.archlinux.org didn't read why/if the goals were different for this vs the -rc one, but worth looking at. it is linked directly in ArchWiki and seems to be quite popular
[20:37:30] <abelvesa> I think I should just fork the linux-mainline and add aarch64 to it. And mark the linux-rc as out-of-date.
[20:43:27] <solskogen|M> what's the difference between linux-mainline and the linux package?
[20:47:41] -!- m_a_r_k has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
[20:49:44] <julemand101> solskogen|M: mainline follows... mainline? E.g. it is 7.1rc1 now
[20:50:02] <solskogen|M> so it's linux-git?
[20:50:06] <julemand101> https://kernel.org
[20:50:08] <phrik> Title: The Linux Kernel Archives (at kernel.org)
[20:50:10] <julemand101> No
[20:50:14] <solskogen|M> or.. linux-rc?
[20:50:37] <julemand101> Yeah, release candidates you could say
[20:50:59] <solskogen|M> just the naming that's a bit confusing then.
[20:51:12] <julemand101> Yeah, but it is what it is named on kernel.org :P
[21:12:52] <abelvesa> linux-rc used to take snapshots (tarball)
[21:13:30] <abelvesa> linux-mainline uses git+https, so it follows whatever torvalds's tree looks like at that time
[21:14:54] <abelvesa> but there is no point for linux-rc to exist since the delta between the latest rc snapshot and mainline is minimal